Recent Docket Entries
| Date | Case | Prepared by Docket Entry | The case |
|---|---|---|---|
| October 2026 | |||
| Thomas v. The Michaels Organization, LLC | First Amended Complaint and Demand for a Jury Trial | Air Force family alleges four years of water intrusion and mold at MacDill privatized housing caused respiratory and skin injuries; sues owner, manager, and parent entity for breach, negligence, gross negligence, misrepresentation, and fraud after Defendants' Rule 12 motion invoked the federal enclave doctrine. | |
| Phillip v. The Michaels Organization, LLC | First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | A Marine family alleges MacDill privatized-housing defendants concealed the home's mold history, dismissed reported mold as "dust," cleaned ducts without containment, and painted over hurricane damage, causing physical injuries. Fifteen counts: contract, negligence, statutory habitability, misrepresentation, fraud, FDUTPA. Federal enclave doctrine shapes applicable Florida law. | |
| Scire v. The Michaels Organization, LLC | Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | Air Force Major Robert Scire, his wife, and minor son allege privatized MacDill housing exposed them to sewage, water intrusion, and HVAC mold, causing sepsis, mastoiditis, and respiratory injuries; Harbor Bay closed work orders, skipped mold testing, and concealed a prior mold complaint. Defendants move to dismiss. | |
| Greiner v. Spacelabs Healthcare, LLC | First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | A woman alleges her employer and its parent company terminated her at age 59 because of her sex and age, and in retaliation for her complaints of discrimination. The parent company has moved to dismiss the complaint. | |
| Devore v. Bern's Steak House, Inc. | Second Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | A server alleges the restaurant that employed her for about seventeen years terminated her one day after she had anxiety symptoms at work. The restaurant has moved to dismiss her amended complaint. | |
Recent Docket Entries present court records and educational analysis. They are not legal advice. Docket Entry is a technology company. It is not a law firm.