Docket Entry

For plaintiff-side federal firms

Build a plaintiff-side
powerhouse.

The future is here, and the future of plaintiff-side litigation is agentic.

Agents move when the docket moves. When the defense moves to dismiss, an ordinary opposition is back in an hour or less. Your lawyers get a brief to review, not a brief to write.

Docket Entry is a technology company. We build the technology behind agentic litigation.

The other side moves.
Your next entry is drafted.

U.S. District Court · E.D. Va.Rivera v. Halvorsen Logistics, Inc.1:25-cv-00412
Watching the docket
1COMPLAINT · Built by Docket Entry

Illustration. Not a real case.

Recent Docket Entries

All Recent Docket Entries →

M.D. Fla. · 8:26-cv-02658

Thomas v. The Michaels Organization, LLC

  • Court recordComplaintECF No. 1 · 09/11/2026 · 42 pp.
  • Court recordDefendants' Motion to Dismiss ComplaintECF No. 18 · 10/08/2026 · 19 pp.
  • Prepared by Docket EntryFirst Amended Complaint and Demand for a Jury TrialNot filed in the case · 33 pp.

M.D. Fla. · 8:26-cv-02634

Phillip v. The Michaels Organization, LLC

  • Court recordComplaintECF No. 1 · 09/09/2026 · 44 pp.
  • Court recordDefendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, or in the alternative, Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsECF No. 17 · 10/08/2026 · 19 pp.
  • Prepared by Docket EntryFirst Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialNot filed in the case · 40 pp.

M.D. Fla. · 8:26-cv-02696

Scire v. The Michaels Organization, LLC

  • Court recordComplaintECF No. 1 · 09/15/2026 · 50 pp.
  • Court recordDefendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsECF No. 20 · 10/08/2026 · 19 pp.
  • Prepared by Docket EntryAmended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialNot filed in the case · 44 pp.

M.D. Fla. · 5:26-cv-00611

Greiner v. Spacelabs Healthcare, LLC

  • Court recordComplaint and Demand for Jury TrialECF No. 1 · 08/27/2026 · 17 pp.
  • Court recordOSI Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss ComplaintECF No. 12 · 10/01/2026 · 12 pp.
  • Prepared by Docket EntryFirst Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialNot filed in the case · 28 pp.

M.D. Fla. · 8:26-cv-01552

Devore v. Bern's Steak House, Inc.

  • Court recordAmended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialECF No. 25 · 09/23/2026 · 20 pp.
  • Court recordDefendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialECF No. 28 · 10/06/2026 · 14 pp.
  • Prepared by Docket EntrySecond Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialNot filed in the case · 16 pp.

A motion to dismiss, within the hour

Docket Entry runs the steps. Your lawyers make the calls.

The defense files at 4:12 p.m. Before the hour is out, your lawyer is reading the opposition. Every citation is checked, every quotation is matched to its source, and the brief is formatted to the court’s rules.

What happens in between is ours. What gets filed is yours.

Responding to a motion

Responding is not always opposing.

Docket Entry reads what the motion is really attacking and drafts the response it calls for. Your lawyers decide what goes to the court.

The industry is helping lawyers do the same work faster.

We remove most of that work from the lawyer altogether.

The lawyer’s scarce time moves away from reading, researching, outlining, drafting, revising, checking, and formatting and toward the things the lawyer actually needs to own:

Judgment. Strategy. Client decisions. Negotiation. Depositions. Hearings. Trial.

That is the capacity story.
And once the other side can no longer reliably consume dozens of human hours simply by putting another motion on the docket, that becomes the attrition story.

Docket Entry brings litigation drafting to the AI tools lawyers already use.

ChatGPT Claude Harvey Microsoft Copilot

Capacity

Your caseload is a count of hours.

A contingency firm pays for the whole case in the hours of its own lawyers. Each motion the other side files costs days the firm does not bill, and the days come from another case. Enough motions, and the firm is in a war of attrition on its own calendar.

When the answer comes from Docket Entry, the days stay with the firm. The same lawyers carry more cases. Cases that were too expensive to litigate come back into range. And a motion meant to wear the firm down costs your lawyers a review and a decision instead of days of work.

The partner takes the good case the calendar used to turn away.

Security, confidentiality, control

We cannot read your files.

Docket Entry runs where your files already are: on your firm’s own infrastructure, on your firm’s own keys. None of it comes to us. So there is no vault of your documents for us to guard, and no one here to keep out of it.

Your firm’s infrastructure

Diagram. Your firm’s matter, your agents, your firm’s keys and the draft all sit inside your firm’s infrastructure. Requests go out on your firm’s keys to the providers your firm already uses. Docket Entry, the company, stands outside. No line connects it to your firm.

Your firm’s infrastructure
Your firm’s matterClient filesPrivileged emailMedical records
Your agentsYour firm’s keys
The draft, to your firm

To the providers your firm already uses

Docket Entry, the company

Docket Entry stays outside, with no view in.

Judgment

Your lawyers do the lawyering.

The drafting runs on Docket Entry. The judgment is yours. What arrives is consistent with the work of a talented junior lawyer, and your best people keep their attention for high-level thinking and strategy.

What the lawyer keeps

Opening your own plaintiff-side firm?

See the Founding Firm Program

Try it

Your firm’s real work. On your own infrastructure.

Docket Entry drafts. Your lawyers hold the work to your firm’s standard. Docket Entry charges nothing for the evaluation.

Try it